Tax Talks
  • Home
  • Episodes
  • People
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

19 | Sole Purpose Test

The sole purpose test is one of the cornerstones of Australia’s superannuation regulations. These regulations don’t tell super funds how to invest. Instead they set a framework with the sole purpose test at its core. According to the ATO the sole purpose test is most commonly breached regulation.

Sole Purpose Test

The sole purpose test doesn’t just apply to SMSFs but to all regulated superannuation funds.

Legal Framework

The sole purpose test is set out in subsection 62(1) of the SIS Act 1993. It requires each trustee of a self managed superannuation fund (SMSF) to maintain the SMSF solely for the purposes specified in that subsection. S 62 is a civil penalty provision and eligible for administrative penalties.

SMSFR 2008/2 is the ATOs current ruling on the sole purpose test. Its title is Self Managed Superannuation Funds: the application of the sole purpose test in section 62 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 to the provision of benefits other than retirement, employment termination or death benefits.  SMSFRs are not binding on the ATO.

Sole Purpose

Sole purpose comprises core and ancillary purposes. An SMSF must pursue at least one core purpose, but can also pursue an ancillary purpose in addition to a core purpose.

Core Purpose

A core purpose is the provision of

  1. retirement benefits
  2. benefits after reaching an age specified in the regulations (such as preservation age) and/or
  3. death benefits

A fund must pursue at least one core purpose.

Ancillary Purposes

In addition to a core purpose, a fund can also provide

  1. benefits after termination of employment
  2. benefits after leaving work due to ill-health
  3. other benefits approved by the regulator

Breach

Complying with the sole purpose test requires an “exclusivity of purpose”, above what would be a “dominant or principal purpose”.

The ATO states in SMSFR 2008/2 that “a survey of all of the events and circumstances relating to the SMSF’s maintenance” is to determine if there has been a breach of s62.

Factors that may indicate a breach of the sole purpose test include whether the trustees sought the benefit, the benefit influenced the trustees’ decision or the fund incurs a cost to provide the benefit.

Factors that may indicate that the sole purpose test was not breached would include that the benefit is

  • inherent or unavoidable
  • remote, isolated or insignificant
  • on an arm’s length commercial basis

Beyond Retirement

The sole purpose test applies beyond the retirement of a member. Even in retirement phase the fund must still focus on providing retirement benefits into the future. The trustee is only to pay benefits in an approved form, such as a pension or lump sum.

Collectables and Personal Use

Collectables and personal-use items are an issue due to the likelihood of providing a prohibited benefit. The collectables rules in s62A and SIS regulation 13.18AA clarify this further.

 

MORE

Common Reporting Standards

Estate Planning

The Great Debate

 

Disclaimer: Tax Talks does not provide financial or tax advice. This applies to these show notes as well as the actual podcast interview. All information on Tax Talks is provided for entertainment purposes only and might no longer be up to date or correct. You should seek professional accredited tax and financial advice when considering whether the information is suitable to your or your client’s circumstances.

Last Updated on 06 May 2020

Tax Talks spoke to Manoj Abichandani - Head at Online SMSF Auditor/Trustdeed.comau - for more details.

Popular
  • The Panama Papers30 | The Panama Papers27/02/2018 - 6:11 AM
  • Common reporting standards36 | Common Reporting Standards10/04/2018 - 1:15 AM
  • team structure199 | Team Structure17/11/2019 - 10:40 PM
  • Ideal Team Structure200 | Ideal Team Structure18/11/2019 - 10:41 PM
Recent
  • 437 | Subdiv EA and Beyond24/03/2025 - 2:33 PM
  • 436 | The Bendel Case Part 206/03/2025 - 9:06 AM
  • 435 | The Bendel Case Part 105/03/2025 - 10:02 AM
  • 434 | Item 17 Ministerial Determination09/12/2024 - 9:47 AM
Comments
  • […] might remember that the Top 10 list for 2020 included...08/03/2021 - 9:16 AM by Two Drunk Accountants | How do you create a podcast | Tax Talks
  • […] With a turnover of $1m that is pretty close to...04/03/2021 - 9:32 AM by CATS Accountants | Unique in seven ways | Tax Talks
  • […] a turnover of $1m that is pretty close to the...01/03/2021 - 9:26 AM by CATS Accountants | Unique in seven ways | Tax Talks
  • […] CRS podcast link – https://www.taxtalks.com.au/common-reporting-standards/...21/09/2020 - 11:46 PM by Common Reporting Standard - The ATO battle against tax havens
Tags
Accounting Administration ATO Business CGT Charity Child Support Class Concession COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Data Debt Deduction Depreciation Div 7A Estate Family Farm FBT Finance GST Income Innovation Insurance International Law Management Payroll Policy Practice Practitioner Property PSI Reports Restructure SME SMSF Software Succession Tax Tax Concessions TPB Trust US

Topics

  • Accounting (3)
  • CGT (39)
  • COVID-19 (23)
  • Cryptocurrency (5)
  • Div 7A (21)
  • FBT (4)
  • Finance (9)
  • GST (19)
  • Innovation (7)
  • Insurance (4)
  • International Tax (44)
  • Land Tax (5)
  • Law (41)
  • Other (10)
  • Payroll (6)
  • Policy (17)
  • Practice Management (83)
  • Property (12)
  • PSI (5)
  • Retirement (1)
  • SMSF (70)
  • Software (23)
  • Stamp Duty (2)
  • Tax Administration (23)
  • Tax Concessions (7)
  • Tax Deductions (17)
  • Tax Effective Structuring (7)
  • Tax Practitioners Board (5)
  • Trust (65)

KEYWORDs

Accounting Administration ATO Business CGT Charity Child Support Class Concession COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Data Debt Deduction Depreciation Div 7A Estate Family Farm FBT Finance GST Income Innovation Insurance International Law Management Payroll Policy Practice Practitioner Property PSI Reports Restructure SME SMSF Software Succession Tax Tax Concessions TPB Trust US
18 | Family Law family law TRIS to an ABP 20 | TRIS to an ABP

Tax Talks

Tax Talks is Australia’s tax news podcast for tax professionals. Informative, entertaining and free.

Liability Limited by a scheme under the Professional Standards Legislations

Latest Episodes

  • 437 | Subdiv EA and Beyond24/03/2025 - 2:33 PM
  • 436 | The Bendel Case Part 206/03/2025 - 9:06 AM
  • 435 | The Bendel Case Part 105/03/2025 - 10:02 AM

Connect with us

Contact Us





    Please prove you are human by selecting the cup.

    © Copyright - Tax Talks - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • TERMS
    • PRIVACY
    18 | Family Law family law TRIS to an ABP 20 | TRIS to an ABP
    Scroll to top