Tax Talks
  • Home
  • Episodes
  • People
  • Articles
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

303 | Unfair Contract Case Study

Sponsored By

Here is an unfair contract case study to show you how the unfair contract term provisions work.

Unfair Contract Case Study

In the last episode, we covered the unfair contract term provisions. In this episode with the help of Simone Daniells of Andreyev Lawyers in Sydney we will look at a case a listener in Sydney emailed to us.

Here is what we learned but please listen in as Simone explains all this much better than we ever could.

To listen while you drive, walk or work, just access the episode through a free podcast app on your mobile phone.

Unfair Contract Case Study

Let’s assume your client is an e-commerce business, which enters into a contract with a freight forwarder. The contract stipulates monthly payments over a contract term of five years.

But then your client and the freight forwarder have a fallout and your client wants to end the contract. The freight forwarder says, “That is fine but you still need to pay me for the remaining 4 years.”

Can your client get out of this contractual obligation by pointing to the unfair contract term provisions?

If you haven’t listened to ep 302 Unfair Contract Term Provisions yet, please do so, since the following will make more sense if you do.

Question # 1 – Are you a small business? 

Does your client have less than 20 employees and an upfront price of less than $300,000 or if for more than 12 months, of $1m? 

Question # 2 – Is it a standard form contract?

Can the other party prove that at least one of the terms was negotiated? If not, the presumption is that the contract is a standard form contract.

So if in doubt, standard form contract.

Question # 3 – Do you pass the 3-limb test?

Does your client pass all of the following:

I – Significant Imbalance?

Is there a significant imbalance between the parties? Is it difficult to get a freight forwarder? How much choice did your client have?

II – Protect Legitimate Interest?

Does the freight forwarder have a legitimate interest to hold on to the contract? Did they – for example – incur a lot of costs upfront that they now need to recuperate over the remaining years? Is a five-year lock-in contract common and industry practice? Or much longer than common?

III – Detriment?

Would holding on to the terms be detrimental to your client? Of course, it would. So this one is easy. 

So depending on how you answer each of these questions, the unfair contract term provisions will apply and release your client from having to pay.

MORE

Unfair Contract Terms

PSI Rules

The History of PSI

 

Disclaimer: Tax Talks does not provide financial or tax advice. All information on Tax Talks is of a general nature only and might no longer be up to date or correct. You should seek professional accredited tax and financial advice when considering whether the information is suitable to your or your client’s circumstances.

Last Updated on 24 August 2021

Tax Talks spoke to Simone Daniells - Senior Lawyer at Andreyev Lawyers - for more details.

Popular
  • The Panama Papers30 | The Panama Papers27/02/2018 - 6:11 AM
  • Common reporting standards36 | Common Reporting Standards10/04/2018 - 1:15 AM
  • team structure199 | Team Structure17/11/2019 - 10:40 PM
  • Ideal Team Structure200 | Ideal Team Structure18/11/2019 - 10:41 PM
Recent
  • 437 | Subdiv EA and Beyond24/03/2025 - 2:33 PM
  • 436 | The Bendel Case Part 206/03/2025 - 9:06 AM
  • 435 | The Bendel Case Part 105/03/2025 - 10:02 AM
  • 434 | Item 17 Ministerial Determination09/12/2024 - 9:47 AM
Comments
  • […] might remember that the Top 10 list for 2020 included...08/03/2021 - 9:16 AM by Two Drunk Accountants | How do you create a podcast | Tax Talks
  • […] With a turnover of $1m that is pretty close to...04/03/2021 - 9:32 AM by CATS Accountants | Unique in seven ways | Tax Talks
  • […] a turnover of $1m that is pretty close to the...01/03/2021 - 9:26 AM by CATS Accountants | Unique in seven ways | Tax Talks
  • […] CRS podcast link – https://www.taxtalks.com.au/common-reporting-standards/...21/09/2020 - 11:46 PM by Common Reporting Standard - The ATO battle against tax havens
Tags
Accounting Administration ATO Business CGT Charity Child Support Class Concession COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Data Debt Deduction Depreciation Div 7A Estate Family Farm FBT Finance GST Income Innovation Insurance International Law Management Payroll Policy Practice Practitioner Property PSI Reports Restructure SME SMSF Software Succession Tax Tax Concessions TPB Trust US

Topics

  • Accounting (3)
  • CGT (39)
  • COVID-19 (23)
  • Cryptocurrency (5)
  • Div 7A (21)
  • FBT (4)
  • Finance (9)
  • GST (19)
  • Innovation (7)
  • Insurance (4)
  • International Tax (44)
  • Land Tax (5)
  • Law (41)
  • Other (10)
  • Payroll (6)
  • Policy (17)
  • Practice Management (83)
  • Property (12)
  • PSI (5)
  • Retirement (1)
  • SMSF (70)
  • Software (23)
  • Stamp Duty (2)
  • Tax Administration (23)
  • Tax Concessions (7)
  • Tax Deductions (17)
  • Tax Effective Structuring (7)
  • Tax Practitioners Board (5)
  • Trust (65)

KEYWORDs

Accounting Administration ATO Business CGT Charity Child Support Class Concession COVID-19 Cryptocurrency Data Debt Deduction Depreciation Div 7A Estate Family Farm FBT Finance GST Income Innovation Insurance International Law Management Payroll Policy Practice Practitioner Property PSI Reports Restructure SME SMSF Software Succession Tax Tax Concessions TPB Trust US
302 | Unfair Contract Terms unfair contract terms 304 | Structure Property Development

Tax Talks

Tax Talks is Australia’s tax news podcast for tax professionals. Informative, entertaining and free.

Liability Limited by a scheme under the Professional Standards Legislations

Latest Episodes

  • 437 | Subdiv EA and Beyond24/03/2025 - 2:33 PM
  • 436 | The Bendel Case Part 206/03/2025 - 9:06 AM
  • 435 | The Bendel Case Part 105/03/2025 - 10:02 AM

Connect with us

Contact Us





    Please prove you are human by selecting the flag.

    © Copyright - Tax Talks - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • TERMS
    • PRIVACY
    302 | Unfair Contract Terms unfair contract terms 304 | Structure Property Development
    Scroll to top